What is the role of the configuration control board?

In most organizations, the Change Manager chairs the Change Advisory Board. Depending on the typical activity in your IT department, your CAB may meet as often as twice weekly. No matter the frequency of meetings, the Change Manager should communicate the scheduled change required well in advance of meetings, so individuals on the CAB are prepared to make the best decisions. Mostly involved in decision making for deployments to IT production environments, the configuration control boards Change Advisory Board (CAB) is a body constituted to support the authorization of changes and to assist change management in the assessment, prioritization, and scheduling of changes. When taken together, these security control principles form the basis for the security requirements, which should be defined in any level of architecture and design. The general control configuration used for the synthesis of the favourite controller is shown in figure 1(b).

configuration control boards

A Change control board can be one of the primary reasons in the success or failure of the projects in an organization. Most of the projects fails because of too many unplanned changes and scope creep. Organizations may choose to have a single CCB handling change requests across multiple projects. A low-level CCB could handle lower priority change requests, for instance non-customer-facing features or changes with low/no cost impact. A higher-level CCB could tackle major change requests that have significant impact on costs or customer. Logbooks should be maintained with each prototype board and these logs should be kept up-to-date.

Prepare the change requests and supporting documents

Our experience in this business allows us to find developers on a remote basis from Ukraine for a reasonable final price. To effect change to a product, the first step is the revision
of the documents defining the product. The concepts discussed below
facilitate accomplishing this step, using automated tools such as
a CM AIS. https://www.globalcloudteam.com/ This handbook views these concepts from both program management
(macro) point of view and the document control (micro) point of
view. Create a configuration management practice that will provide ongoing value to the organization. Joseph is a global best practice trainer and consultant with over 14 years corporate experience.

configuration control boards

The classification
criteria must be applied to all of the CI applications via coordination
between the affected activities. The configuration of these systems is critical to your organization’s success. Configuration is what makes your systems (servers, networks, operating systems, data centers, configuration files, IT assets and all other configuration items) work. They include drag and drop, matching, sorting, and fill in the blank questions.

Default Configuration

Results show that DMC is able to greatly reduce the energy consumption, both in terms of aeration and pumping energy. Furthermore, ammonia concentration in the effluent and total nitrogen are significantly reduced. Among the different proposed strategies, C1 and C3 are the best in term of pollutant removal, but they are not the most convenient for energy consumption.

configuration control boards

An internal CCB comprising developers and technical managers is formed to deal with changes in design approaches that will not be visible to the customer or impact costs and delivery dates. A configuration is the set of characteristics that define a final product or deliverable. Physical specifications may include the color, size, weight, shape, and materials. Pass the first time with quality practice test questions, performance-based questions, flashcards, and audio. Learn how ServiceOps can help you predict change risks using service and operational data, support cross-functional collaboration to solve problems, and automatically recommend problem resolutions.

What is a Change Advisory Board?

The span of Configuration control begins for the Government once
the first configuration document is approved and baselined. This
normally occurs when the functional configuration baseline (referred
to as the requirements baseline in EIA/IS-649) is established for
a system or configuration item. Configuration control is an essential discipline
throughout the program life cycle.

  • Mostly involved in decision making for deployments to IT production environments, the Change Advisory Board (CAB) is a body constituted to support the authorization of changes and to assist change management in the assessment, prioritization, and scheduling of changes.
  • The CAB can also meet to review previously executed changes particularly those that were unsuccessful or unauthorized, as well as plan the forward schedule of future changes particularly with regard to projected service outage and customer/business plans.
  • This problem is ready to be solved by the off- shelf software (Gahinet et al. 1995).
  • Table 6-1 provides an activity guide for the evaluation of a
    configuration control process.
  • The organization’s change management policy will define the CAB’s constitution and its scope, which can include anything from proposals and deployments to changes to roles and documentation.
  • The contractual configuration control authority approving the
    implementation of a change to a product (system/CI) may initially
    reside with a contractor or with the Government.

Changes to contractor baselined documentation must
all be reviewed by the contractor to determine if they also impact
government performance requirements and support activities. A group of qualified people with responsibility for the process of regulating and approving changes to hardware, firmware, software, and documentation throughout the development and operational life cycle of an information system. Each element of the structural configuration must be specified to support software implementation.

Quality and Systems Assurance Managers

Acknowledging and addressing any concerns or issues raised by the CCB members and other stakeholders should also be done while providing evidence, rationale, and alternatives where possible. Ultimately, seeking win-win solutions that balance the needs and interests of all parties involved while maintaining the project objectives is key. Lastly, communicating the CCB decisions clearly and promptly to all relevant stakeholders with explanations of reasons and implications will help foster trust, cooperation, and satisfaction among all involved.

Clarifying the roles and responsibilities of each CCB member helps to avoid confusion, duplication, and delays. At every meeting, the Change Advisory Board reviews requested changes using a standard evaluation framework. That framework should consider all dimensions of the change, including service and technical components, business and customer alignment, and compliance and risk. The CAB must also look for conflicting requests—these cases in particular require CAB members to maintain holistic, business-outcomes views that don’t favor the particular team or individual seeking the change.

Developing a Configuration Management Plan

CCB membership
should consist of, but not be limited to representatives from logistics,
training, engineering, production management, contracting, configuration
management and other program related functional disciplines. There may be multiple configuration control authorities for a
product with more than one user; each being a configuration control
authority for a given contract. They cannot
authorize change to either, but they may participate in the change
control process if asked for input by either the configuration control
authority that is the CDCA, or by the Government lead application
activity. The contractual configuration control authority approving the
implementation of a change to a product (system/CI) may initially
reside with a contractor or with the Government. It may transfer
from the contractor to the Government, or may continue to reside
with the contractor throughout the life cycle of the CI. This authority
is technically responsible for the performance of the product as
well as fiscally responsible for funding changes to the product.

configuration control boards

Comments about specific definitions should be sent to the authors of the linked Source publication. For NIST publications, an email is usually found within the document.

Creating a Change Control Board

The Change Control Board and the Change Advisory Board are similar organizational structures play vital roles in decision making. Both are comprised of teams whose role is to collectively help the organization make the right decisions of balancing need and risk of changes to technology that supports business processes, but they’re not the same. IT service management has long suffered from bureaucratic approaches and general risk aversion—which results in layers of approvals, development delays and confusion, and, ultimately, failure to deliver value to customers in an agile manner. This situation is exacerbated in companies with legacy systems and structures that prohibit the flexibility for change that digital transformation requires. The functional architecture must be documented to provide the diagrams, drawings, models, and specifications against which software design synthesis can be performed and evaluated.

Leave your comment